Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tufnell, G.
Right arrow Articles by Georgiades, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tufnell, G.
Right arrow Articles by Georgiades, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

`Good Practice' for Expert Witnesses

Guinevere Tufnell

Forest Healthcare Trust, London E17 3EA

David Cottrell

School of Medicine in Leeds

Daphne Georgiades

The Leadership Corporation

The aim of this article is to look at good practice in expert-witness court reports in Children Act cases. Reports written by child psychiatrist experts differ enormously in the information they contain, the way in which the report is structured and in style of presentation. There may be a number of reasons for this. Child psychiatrists who work as experts receive little or no formal training for this area of their work. There is no official guidance from the courts about how reports should be presented. Guidance to experts by instructing solicitors is often limited. Feedback to experts by `user' groups, such as judges, is often lacking. There are no studies which have sought the views of users as to what they see as the desirable attributes of a report. This questionnaire study was carried out with the support of the Lord Chancellor's Department, the Official Solicitor's Office, the National Association of Guardians ad litem, and the Law Society. It looks at what the users want and what the experts think, and explores the degree to which it is possible for a consensus to be reached by the interested parties. The results of the questionnaire are combined with recent guidance to produce a model format suitable for use in Children Act cases.

Key Words: Children Act • court report • expert witness

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 1, No. 3, 365-383 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/1359104596013006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?