Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Test of Time

Agreeing about Disagreements: A Personal Reflection on Achenbach, McConaughy, and Howell (1987)

Mark C. Edwards

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA, edwardsmark{at}uams.edu

Whether behavior is determined mainly by situational factors or by more stable personality characteristics has been a classic debate in the social sciences. The question of the situational specificity of behavior has important implications for the assessment of children and adolescents. Because children function in multiple settings, clinicians are faced with the task of integrating information obtained from multiple informants from different settings, as well as their own clinical observations and impressions, and making clinical judgments based on this information. This process is challenging when information from different sources is not in agreement. Clinical decision-making and, ultimately, the accuracy of clinical judgments, will be influenced by how clinicians handle such discrepancies. With clinical accuracy being the chief concern in assessment, the debate about the stability vs situational specificity of behavior is an important one. The article by Achenbach, McConaughy, and Howell (1987) entitled ‘Child/Adolescent Behavioral and Emotional Problems: Implications of Cross-Informant Correlations for Situational Specificity’ has made an important contribution to the classic debate and leads to some practical recommendations for assessing children.

Key Words: adolescents • behavior • children • cross-informant comparisons • evaluation

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 10, No. 3, 440-445 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1359104505053760
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?