This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stacey, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Theories of Change in Therapeutic Work

University of Hertfordshire, UK

This article explores how theories of personal change differ from each other according to the assumptions made about the nature of the individual, the relationship between the person and the social, and the nature of causality. Three different concepts of the individual person are distinguished, namely, the autonomous, the expressivist, and the social individual. Each of these implies different relationships between the individual and the social, and different theories of causality. From the perspective of the autonomous individual, change in a person is a rational reordering of individual thought processes. The cause of any personal change is rational effort of the individual. Clinical psychology and psychoanalysis reflect this perspective. From the expressivist perspective, each individual has an inner urge to self-actualize which is the cause of change. Humanistic psychology is based on this view. From the perspective of social individuals, the individual is a cultural being, necessarily dependent on others, who only develops a mind in interaction with others. From this perspective, individual change cannot be separated from change in the groups to which an individual belongs.

Key Words: causality • individual • social • theory of change

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?