This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McGarry, J. Articles by Ross, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McGarry, J. Articles by Ross, N. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Child Mental Health Children's Health Mental Health Teen Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Clinical Effectiveness of a Brief Consultation and Advisory Approach Compared to Treatment as Usual in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services

Lucena CAMHS, Ireland, joan.mcgarry{at}sjog.ie

Fiona McNicholas

University College Dublin, Ireland

Hannah Buckley

Lucena CAMHS, Ireland

Brendan D. Kelly

Mater Hospital Dublin, Ireland

Louise Atkin

Lucena CAMHS, Ireland

Niamh Ross

Children's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

A brief consultation and advice (BCA) approach to dealing with routine referrals was introduced into a child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) over an 18-month period. This is a time-limited, client-centred and solution-focused approach to dealing with common non-complex referrals. The model proposes that all families are seen for an initial `consultation' appointment followed by a maximum of two further appointments. A randomized controlled study compared the clinical effectiveness of BCA treatment with treatment as usual (TAU) over a 6-month period. The parents of children referred to CAMHS were eligible to participate if their child was deemed `non-complex'. Ethical approval was granted by the relevant ethics committee. Families who consented to participate in the study were randomly allocated to either the BCA or TAU group. Sixty children enrolled in the study. Both groups showed improvements on a number of variables at 3 months post treatment, but only those receiving BCA showed continued improvement at 6 months. Participants in both groups showed high levels of satisfaction with the treatment received. Participants in the TAU group expressed dissatisfaction with long waiting times and had a higher drop out rate than the BCA treatment group. During the time frame studied, the introduction of the BCA approach did not lead to a decrease in overall mean waiting time. These results and the usefulness of a BCA model are discussed.

Key Words: brief consultation and advisory approach • CAMHS • two-plus-one-model (2+1) • waiting lists

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 13, No. 3, 365-376 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1359104508090600


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?