This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cousens, P. Articles by Nunn, K. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cousens, P. Articles by Nunn, K. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Is `Self-Regulation' a more Helpful Construct than `Attention'?

Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, Australia

Kenneth Patrick Nunn

Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, Australia

Attentional processes have increasingly moved to a central position in understanding human development and behaviour. When care is given to the definition and the assumptions underlying the notion of attention, however, it becomes apparent that a gulf has developed between clinical folklore and the scientific literature; not all attentional difficulties are due to deficits, and not all problems with behaviours labelled `attention deficit disorder' are due to attention. Distractibility, perceptual impairment, memory impairment and inability to shift cognitive set have received too much attention in the literature, while processing time, complexity of task, cognitive effort and rehearsal strategies have received too little. We propose the broader concept of self-regulation in which attentional processes remain a key component, but in which emotional and contextual factors are crucial contributors in themselves and also interact with attentional processes. The fact that a number of constraints upon self-regulation arise from the very nature of the brain becomes another important consideration. The clinical implications of this approach are considerable. If behavioural self-regulatory difficulties are all equated with attentional difficulties, then there will be a marked increase in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorder (ADD). If, on the other hand, attentional difficulties are seen as only one component of self-regulatory difficulties, differential diagnosis will remain important and emotional regulatory processes and contextual contributions will need to be considered simultaneously. In particular, the interaction between emotional regulation and attentional processes will be the focus of clinical and research endeavour.

Key Words: attention • attention deficit disorder • development • neuropsychiatry • neuropsychology • self-regulation

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 2, No. 1, 27-43 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1359104597021004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. P. Nunn How to Approach Neuropsychiatric Problems when You are not a Neuropsychiatrist: An Hierarchical Formulation Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, January 1, 1997; 2(1): 11 - 26. [Abstract]

				I. Stiefel Can Disturbance in Attachment Contribute to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder? A Case Discussion Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, January 1, 1997; 2(1): 45 - 64. [Abstract]