Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kent, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kent, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Out-Patient Clinic Attendance Consent from Children and Young People: Ethical Aspects and Practical Considerations

Moli Paul

Invicta Community Care, Dartford, UK

David M. Foreman

Keele University, UK

Lindsey Kent

University of Birmingham, UK

There is a growing awareness of the importance of children’s participation in making decisions about their own health care. Although there have been calls for a change in the law regarding children’s consent to treatment, there is a limited amount of empirical research on this subject from clinical practice in the UK. We review some of the legal and ethical discussion on this subject, as well as related research. In our naturalistic survey at a Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) out-patient clinic, 4/42 consecutive cases were unaware of their appointment and 14/42 came unwillingly. The findings show that some children and young people do attend CAMH out-patient services unknowingly and unwillingly. This indicates that we should be ethically concerned about the involvement of children and young people in the consent process surrounding attendance and that the theoretical concerns about children’s consent need to be practically explored more fully in CAMH settings. Overriding young people’s objections to attendance can only be justified if the intervention offered has a sound empirical basis or if professionals can prove that parents overriding their child’s wishes have taken valid objections to the intervention into account.

Key Words: children • consent • psychiatric out-patient clinics

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 5, No. 2, 203-211 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1359104500005002005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
J. O.A. Tan, G. E. Passerini, and A. Stewart
Consent and Confidentiality in Clinical Work with Young People
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, April 1, 2007; 12(2): 191 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
S. D. Edwards and E. Street
Clinical Ethics Committees: A Practical Response to Ethical Problems in Clinical Practice
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, April 1, 2007; 12(2): 253 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
M. Paul
Decision-making about children's mental health care: ethical challenges
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., July 1, 2004; 10(4): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]