Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Wren, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Wren, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Validity of the Diagnosis of Gender Identity Disorder (Child and Adolescent Criteria)

Ian Wilson

Central Manchester and Manchester Children’s University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, IDW807{at}bham.ac.uk

Chris Griffin

University of Birmingham, UK

Bernadette Wren

Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, UK

This article looks at the diagnosis of gender identity disorder (child and adolescent criteria) as used in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV). It considers how gender identity disorder came to be in the fourth edition, and explores some of the problematic aspects of the DSM-IV criteria. The authors argue that research has focused on cross-gender behaviours and gender role, and consequently muddled issues of pathology. In particular, that this has served to pressurize boys to conform to traditional gender and heterosexual roles. The authors suggest that the pathology accompanying gender identity dysphoria should be the focus of the clinical work rather than treating gender role behaviour. It is proposed that the model of atypical gender identity organization, is able to account for the diverse factors that may be contributing to a discordant gender identity, without labelling what may be a normal developmental pathway as pathological.

Key Words: disorder • DSM • gender • identity • validity

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 7, No. 3, 335-351 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1359104502007003003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SexualitiesHome page
K. Bryant
In Defense of Gay Children? `Progay' Homophobia and the Production of Homonormativity
Sexualities, August 1, 2008; 11(4): 455 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]