Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waaktaar, T.
Right arrow Articles by Torgersen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Waaktaar, T.
Right arrow Articles by Torgersen, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

How Can Young People’s Resilience be Enhanced? Experiences from a Clinical Intervention Project

Trine Waaktaar

Nic Waals Institute/Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Region East and South, Norway trine.waaktaar{at}r-bup.no

Helen J. Christie

Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Region East and South, Norway

Anne Inger Helmen Borge

University of Oslo, Norway

Svenn Torgersen

University of Oslo, Norway

The aim of this project was to explore how resilience factors could be utilized in a clinical intervention for young people with stressful background experiences. Four resilience factors constituted the basis for the intervention: positive peer relations, self-efficacy, creativity, and coherence. Four main therapeutic principles were derived and elaborated with technical operationalizations: (i) focus on group work with same-age peers, and foster prosocial, supportive and accepting interactions; (ii) organize group work around activities the participants are motivated to learn more about, and assist them in reaching specified group and individual goals; (iii) facilitate playful exploration and individual symbolic expression within the chosen activity; and (iv) encourage and assist participants’ attempts to make meaningful and beneficial connections between different aspects of their past, present and future lives. Nine groups underwent the intervention. As the case illustration shows, this approach gave inspiration to thinking and practice that was perceived as clinically meaningful. However, more knowledge of the interplay between positive and negative chain reactions is needed to develop adequate interventions.

Key Words: coherence • creativity • positive peer relations • resilience intervention • self-efficacy

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 9, No. 2, 167-183 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1359104504041917


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
R. Velleman and L. Templeton
Understanding and modifying the impact of parents' substance misuse on children
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., March 1, 2007; 13(2): 79 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
D. Kenkel and M. Couling
Child advocacy: a dialogue of inclusion
Community Dev. J., October 1, 2006; 41(4): 481 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]